Skip to content

RDKB-62953: Primary channel ID is incorrect in GUI for OFDM#97

Merged
hpatel006c merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
bug/RDKB-62953-v3
Jan 29, 2026
Merged

RDKB-62953: Primary channel ID is incorrect in GUI for OFDM#97
hpatel006c merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
bug/RDKB-62953-v3

Conversation

@pavankumar464
Copy link
Contributor

Reason for change: Primary channel ID is incorrect in GUI when the locked primary channel is OFDM

Test Procedure: Test for Primary channel ID

Risks:low
Priority: P1
Signed-off-by: pavankumarreddy_balireddy@comcast.com

Reason for change: Primary channel ID is incorrect in GUI when the
locked primary channel is OFDM

Test Procedure: Test for Primary channel ID

Risks:low
Priority: P1
Signed-off-by: pavankumarreddy_balireddy@comcast.com
@pavankumar464 pavankumar464 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 28, 2026 15:46
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 28, 2026 15:46
@pavankumar464 pavankumar464 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 28, 2026 15:46
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Fixes the GUI’s “Primary channel ID” display when the locked primary downstream channel is OFDM by reordering how OFDM channels are represented in the downstream table.

Changes:

  • Builds a DsOfdm channel table and derives lock status from SubcarrierZeroFreq.
  • Detects the OFDM primary channel via ChanIndicator and moves it to the front of the downstream display list so the “Primary channel” note references the correct ChannelID.
  • Updates the downstream table header colspan to account for both non-OFDM and OFDM columns.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@hpatel006c hpatel006c merged commit bd8a184 into develop Jan 29, 2026
14 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 29, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants